8 reviews for Webs are not recommended
These reviews are not recommended because our content quality algorithms have determined them to be less useful for users researching this business. Our content quality algorithm makes decisions based on a number of proprietary evaluation factors, and is constantly updating and improving over time. Even though these reviews are not displayed by default, they still factor into the overall number of reviews and the average rating for the business.
Kentucky
1 review
1 helpful vote

Ok. Room for improvement.
March 13, 2015

Came across this review today, as I am exploring alternatives to Webs.

While I have had great success utilizing their interface for the theatre I work for http://www.strangebedfellowstheatre.com I have had some issues with the limitations of the site builder.
Templates often go wonky when switching, but that's only an issue for the first while for a site. Updates are VERY smooth, and the page linking utility is a great tool. Occassionally the publish command does not execute properly, and you may need to re-edit though.

Service is soundly "meh" and while I have gotten all issues resolved EVENTUALLY, the amount of time it took was irritating. This could be improved!

I work with WordPress elsewhere, and have considered uCoz, but for now, we'll stick out our subscription with Webs before moving. I'm honestly impressed with what CAN be done with the system, but it leaves a lot on the table.

Good starting system, though there may be alternatives that better serve your needs out there.

Date of experience: March 13, 2015
Loading...